Brady v. Maryland is a landmark 1963 Supreme Court case establishing that prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence—information favorable to the defendant that could exonerate or reduce their guilt—to the defense. Failure to provide such evidence violates the defendant’s due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. This obligation, known as the “Brady Rule,” ensures fair trials by preventing wrongful convictions through the suppression of important, potentially outcome-altering information.
Brady v. Maryland is a landmark 1963 Supreme Court case establishing that prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence—information favorable to the defendant that could exonerate or reduce their guilt—to the defense. Failure to provide such evidence violates the defendant’s due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. This obligation, known as the “Brady Rule,” ensures fair trials by preventing wrongful convictions through the suppression of important, potentially outcome-altering information.
What is exculpatory evidence?
Evidence favorable to the defendant that could exonerate them or lessen guilt.
What did Brady v. Maryland decide?
A 1963 Supreme Court ruling that prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense because withholding it violates due process.
What kinds of information count as exculpatory evidence?
Examples include alibi evidence, eyewitness testimony supporting the defense, or lab results and other findings that undermine the prosecution’s case.
What does the term 'material' mean in Brady law?
Materiality means the exculpatory evidence would have a reasonable probability of influencing the verdict if it had been disclosed.
What are possible remedies for a Brady violation?
If a Brady violation is found, courts may grant a new trial, reverse a conviction, or provide other relief to correct the error.