Causal inference for evaluation, particularly uplift and counterfactuals, involves assessing the true impact of interventions or treatments by comparing what actually happened (factual) with what would have occurred otherwise (counterfactual). In the context of LLM evaluations (evals), this approach helps determine how model changes or features affect outcomes, isolating the specific effect of modifications and enabling more accurate measurement of improvements or regressions, rather than relying solely on observed results.
Causal inference for evaluation, particularly uplift and counterfactuals, involves assessing the true impact of interventions or treatments by comparing what actually happened (factual) with what would have occurred otherwise (counterfactual). In the context of LLM evaluations (evals), this approach helps determine how model changes or features affect outcomes, isolating the specific effect of modifications and enabling more accurate measurement of improvements or regressions, rather than relying solely on observed results.
What is causal inference in evaluation?
Causal inference aims to determine whether a treatment actually causes a change in an outcome, using counterfactual reasoning and methods that separate causation from mere correlation.
What is an uplift model?
An uplift model predicts the individual-level incremental effect of a treatment, estimating how much a person’s outcome would improve if they receive the treatment versus if they do not.
What are counterfactuals in this context?
Counterfactuals are the hypothetical outcomes that would have occurred under different actions. They are used to estimate treatment effects by comparing actual results to these imagined alternatives.
How do you evaluate uplift models or causal estimates?
Use metrics that capture incremental gains (e.g., uplift/Qini curves and AUUC) and, when possible, validate with randomized experiments to estimate the true treatment effect.