Holistic Safety Evaluations across Harm Categories (LLM Evaluations or evals) refer to comprehensive assessments of large language models (LLMs) that systematically examine their behavior across a wide range of potential harm categories, such as bias, toxicity, misinformation, and privacy risks. These evaluations aim to identify and mitigate risks by testing models in diverse scenarios, ensuring robust safety standards and responsible AI deployment across various real-world contexts.
Holistic Safety Evaluations across Harm Categories (LLM Evaluations or evals) refer to comprehensive assessments of large language models (LLMs) that systematically examine their behavior across a wide range of potential harm categories, such as bias, toxicity, misinformation, and privacy risks. These evaluations aim to identify and mitigate risks by testing models in diverse scenarios, ensuring robust safety standards and responsible AI deployment across various real-world contexts.
What is a holistic safety evaluation?
A comprehensive risk assessment that examines all relevant harm categories (physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic, psychosocial, environmental, cyber) and how they interact, rather than focusing on a single risk.
What are harm categories in safety evaluations?
The types of harm the evaluation aims to prevent or reduce, such as physical injury, chemical exposure, biological hazards, ergonomic strain, psychosocial stress, environmental impact, and data/privacy risks.
How do you assess risk across multiple harm categories?
Identify hazards in each category, estimate likelihood and severity, evaluate exposure, and prioritize controls by overall risk, considering interactions between categories.
What steps help implement and monitor holistic safety controls?
Apply multi-domain controls and the hierarchy of controls, document decisions, train stakeholders, and monitor effectiveness with metrics and periodic reviews.